Those who follow my writings know that I have a slightly different perspective on events at home and abroad than usual. The essence of this different perspective is that life is a game of self-discovery, in which some people play consciously, others unconsciously, and no one actually dies, only "a little", then he/she reborn and the game resumes in a different line-up. 

The Hungarians are dissatisfied, stubborn sort, never happy with the way things are, as if they don't know (yet) that everyone creates his/her own destiny, that there are individual, group and national karmas, which are the joint task of the individual and the community to solve. If the current one, who is presently, is not good, then I wonder who would be a good leader in Hungary today? If you were to ask people to look back on the country's history over the past thousand years and you ask them who they think of as the leading statesmen they consider to be clearly positive, the most likely candidates would be King Stephen, King Matthias, Lajos Kossuth, István Széchenyi, Ferenc Rákóczi 2nd. Where are the former greats of our country now, if everybody is reborn once? Why don't they come here to help us, to lift our country up? 

And now everyone (who doesn't know yet) hold on... The late King Stephen is currently in a material body, but he doesn't live here and he is not a worldly leader. Maybe he shouldn't have been canonized and then we could have gotten him back to run for it once again. Now, let's do a thought experiment, how would function the deified founder of state? To do that, you have to start from how he worked then, because everybody moves on (or not…) from the experiences of his previous lives. Stephen called in foreign soldiers and used them to obliterate half of the country who refused to convert to Christianity. They received, in addition to death, confiscation of property, the latter was distributed among Stephen's supporters. Okay, we have him to thank for our existence as a country, but certainly those who were liquidated in the past would not be too grateful to him that they are Christians now, because individual grievances would drive them into the counter-camp as an unconscious motive. Anyway, let's not envy Stephen, he has enough problems. It is natural that someone who was once a secular leader of a country should now aspire to higher task and want to try himself as a religious (spiritual) leader in a wider community. It is not that easy (either).

The late King Matthias is also in a material body, living among us, and a secular leader. How did he function in those days? He protected the country from the Turks (now the migrants), what he took from his enemies he distributed to his supporters, he exploited the people, yet the people loved him. I wonder what he is doing today? The same. It is totally irrelevant that today we have a so-called democracy. Democracy as a method of government dates back to the ancient Greeks. Because of the beautifying distance and our own illusions, we think that it was fine once and we have lost something. Greek democracy worked no better than it does now. Those who were rich could pay off the people and the orators to campaign for them. Even then, the one whose name was the most public and promised the most won. True, anyone could stand in the market place and make a speech, but that is still the case today, see the demonstrations. They stand up, speak and go home. This was already a method to defuse tension in the time of the Greeks. Well, maybe we would be better with those who were not kings!

Based on my past lives and my situation, I can say that I can find the connection with almost everyone in the beyond who was ever considered someone in this country (if one doesn't believe me, can check it out...). I asked the late Kossuth if he would like to be born today and take a leading role, because he is still remembered with love and respect by the people. No, he said; he would rather become a priest, but not a leader under any circumstances. Why? Because it is true that the level of awareness is the same low today, but everyone thinks they are exceptionally clever, and they are guided only by their own interests, which means that this nation cannot be guided by his methods. Because of this disunity, the country needs a strong one-man leadership if the nation wants to remain in whole and doesn't want to lose its identity completely. The late Széchenyi said the same thing and he was going to be a scientist. He will share advices from out of the field as a political scientist or a sociologist, this comes with less responsibility.

In desperation, I turned to the late Ferenc Rákóczi 2nd. Lord, I ask you to take over the leadership of this country so that order and tranquility may finally prevail. I will consider it, was the answer. But you can see that I personally was the biggest loser of the Rákóczi war of independence, total confiscation of property, exile... I think you can understand that I will not undertake it again under the same conditions. To get back my wealth, influence and power, I am willing to be born into the family of the greatest Hungarian oligarchs. The only problem is that the difference is too great in the intellectual resonance level. 

So, here we are. I only note quietly that Horthy and Gömbös (late Nazi leaders) volunteered, but I signaled them to wait.

Margaret Rhasoda Varga
UCCM head-master
2022. Budapest, Hungary