The previous 425 were written not by me, but I felt compelled to speak out again. When everyone has given their opinion on the current issue of Planet Earth, I usually do a comparative analysis. 

First, I like the virus because it is beautiful. It looks like a chocolate ball, decorated with colored candies. It is no coincidence that it has captured the imagination of several confectioners who have made it in the form of a sweet. It is a delight in everything that exists, the perfection and harmony of its construction. And the fact that some genetic material packed into a small protein shell can have the effect of making masses of people sick and causing their death is nothing short of miraculous. The general human view is very anthropomorphic, looking only at what is beneficial and harmful to them, as if the Universe is obliged to be structured to serve our survival. It is not a little anachronistic that precisely the atheists, who reject divine creation, doubt in the operation of biological iron laws, that is in the nature is a fierce struggle for survival and that those who are not strong enough will perish. As if unconscious matter should strive to privilege human existence above all else over some virus. Yet it is the believers who are the most accepting of nature's rules of operation. 

Since every event is also an exam for humanity, let us analyze a selection of situations to see how we have passed the crown-virus test. By and large, everyone reacted as expected. In the beginning, it was mainly the elderly who started hoarding food, because they remember from experience what it is like to be in short supply. There was no shortage, but it was temporarily created, which could even lead us to recognize that the shortage is collectively create by ourselves. Few of us have recognized this, but a similar situation is likely to recur. The fight for the last packet of toilet paper also left a deep mark on me. Really, what would we do without toilet paper? It's too early to worry, I suggest reading the basic work of the future (the Quran), where we are given detailed instructions for this case: if you have defecated, use water, if it is not any, use soil, the instructions say. 

A particularly fascinating analysis would be the reaction of the authorities. Basically, the mortality rate of the virus would not necessarily have made quarantine essential. Quarantine causes economic damage because institutions cannot function properly, but it may inhibit the spread of the epidemic. However, if there is no quarantine, the health care system may be stretched to the limit to cope with the health care of the sick. No human being on earth has been able to assess in advance what would have been economically more advantageous. Perhaps ex post modelling will be used to examine the question. Since humans are not strong on responsibility, they have opted for the less responsible solution of partial or total quarantine. The whole situation as it has developed shows that emotion, fear and the avoidance of responsibility are powerful driving factors in human society. In other words, the human race is highly emotionally impressionable, is manipulated, otherwise motivated by fear. 

The individual reactions, such as blaming others, as a deflection mechanism, is superposed on this fear.  Who is responsible? Government, authorities, foreigners... OTHERS! At the beginning of the outbreak, there were people who volunteered for testing, but were turned away, and then ended up in quarantine after a few days. What a mess! Not chaos, hospital protocol. If someone from the street went in asymptomatic to be examined, they had to be sent away. But if the next day the authorities brought him in with police as a result of a case-follow-up investigation, he had to be quarantined. This is the regular protocol. Or does anyone seriously think that the nurse in charge of admissions administration at the hospital is going to decide based on one's word who should be admitted? The way as the media have used these various controversial cases to whip up emotions and even panic has been an exciting experience itself. For example, it was suggested that foreigners had lost confidence in the Hungarian authorities and would therefore not consult a doctor. The conclusion suggested: foreigners will be responsible, and the lame authorities, if the epidemic spreads and we should not have complete confidence in the authorities either, because they are doing their job badly. The today's journalism is full of such shameless manipulation. And there are journalists who can then look in the mirror. 

Of course, everyone commented on the topic: including a well-known musician-UFO expert, who dreamt of a conspiracy. Apart from the percentage of people who think he's a lunatic by default, he just said what court jesters do in the royal castle, namely that a not insignificant proportion of humanity really thinks so. Why? Because fear-based human logic throws it out as a result. What they perceive is that some intangible background power is constantly seeking to stir up human conflict, sometimes by political and economic manipulation, sometimes by assassination, sometimes by unleashing riots, overthrowing governments, herding migrants and now by starting a pandemic. In a paper I wrote, I explained that this background power is the matrix, but we are just as much its elements, because it can work by manipulating us only. The matrix is our collective creation, and the only way to eliminate it is if we participate in it consciously. Yet we do not have people queuing up in our courses to learn how to develop awareness and learn to think and act intuitively. The matrix only affects us until we can see out of it. 

Conspiracy theories always have a kernel of truth. Often it is one or two statements (mostly partial truths), but because of the human nature these few statements are magnified, it is added more half-truths and delusions, and then in successive sharing everyone adds their own fears, and in the end the whole stack of statements becomes so unrecognizable that the original kernel of truth is barely unravelable. This can be learned, but it also requires a higher consciousness and a vision behind the claims.  

The conclusion is that it is not so easy to exterminate humanity, nor would it be appropriate if we assume that this was the goal. On the one hand, the human body is a pretty good construct, resistant to natural and even possible artificial pathogens. And pathogens also undergo changes in the interaction, they weaken and we get stronger. On the other hand, if there are too many deaths, the economy will collapse, which cannot be in anyone's long-term interest. In the short term, many people have benefited economically from the Covid, but in the long term it may not be sustainable. Expenditure has encouraged many countries to set up their own vaccine factories, for example, in preparation for similar situations in the future, and this is already hurting the chances of making extra profit. And if anyone fears that there could be damaging and permanent interference in human genetic function, I recommend to study the DNA replication, translation and transcription. 

The living cell controls gene function (and everything else) with such awesome speed and incredible organization that it is impossible to attribute it to the intelligence of dead matter. The deeper we look into the workings of living matter, the more inevitable the realization becomes that the activity that the living cell performs is impossible to carry out without a higher field of intelligence. And if there is such a higher intelligence, it is not human in nature, so there is no reason to fear human intervention, because anyone who does this is like a botcher fitter who reaches with a screwdriver into an electrical outlet in which is current running. The house may burn down and he may be destroyed with it, but there will always be a "fireman" nearby to rescue those who can be saved.   

As a final conclusion, here are the words of my beloved Master. “This Universe was not created to be perfect, but we could become perfect in it.” Therefore, everyone does here what they are not good at. The perfect world was called EDEN, as I recall, where we were thrown out of, because there we did not obey the Authority either, because we wanted to be smarter. If you are looking for a more perfect world than the one you live in now, returning to it is your only option.     

Margaret Rhasoda Varga
UCCM head-master
2021. Budapest, Hungary